Edouard Harris and Jeremie Harris, co-founders and CEOs of Gladstone AI, emphasized the significant role artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to play in national security and warfare during a recent interview on ‘The Will Cain Show.’ Their discussion highlights a crucial topic currently being overshadowed by proposed legislation in the House. Buried within a recent budget reconciliation package is a proposed moratorium aimed at preventing any U.S. state from enacting laws regarding AI or automation for the next decade. This initiative raises critical questions: Why are lawmakers attempting to sneak a 10-year ban on AI regulation into a budget bill?
The answer lies in money and the substantial power wielded by Big Tech companies that have heavily lobbied for such provisions. Many people envision AI as programs like ChatGPT generating text and images. However, for Big Tech, it represents a means for disruption and profit that often translates into less oversight and fewer regulations.
Their vision includes unmonitored driverless trucks, delivery drones encompassing neighborhoods without regulation, and automated warehouses operating without a single human worker present. This evolution poses risks not only to blue-collar positions but also to white-collar jobs across various sectors like finance and law. Current applications of AI have given rise to harmful practices such as creating deepfakes and perpetuating fraud, raising urgent concerns about the absence of public oversight.
While some states are taking steps to regulate AI in areas such as surveillance and workplace automation, the proposed moratorium threatens to strip states of their regulatory rights. If passed, it would be one of the largest federal encroachments on state authority in U.S. history. This legislation could lead to a future where special interests dominate, leaving states powerless in protecting jobs and public safety.
Ultimately, this issue transcends mere policy; it represents a costly compromise where tech giants gain unchecked power at the expense of ordinary workers. Senators have the opportunity to amend this situation and choose to safeguard the interests of hardworking families rather than capitulate to corporations. They must consider the implications of their decisions on American workers and the potential loss of state sovereignty.
Leave a Reply